South Texas Alarm Association Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
743024147
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2011–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Unversal City, TX, USA
Phone
2104026262
Rating
55
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Boards of Trade

Reported finances

Revenue
$2,558
Expenses
$6,865
Assets
$64,713
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • WILLIAM MABIE (PRESIDENT)
  • MARK MATLOCK (VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • WILLIAM MABIE (PRESIDENT)
  • MARK MATLOCK (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • SANDRA BARTON (TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The association is organized for the purpose of improving the business conditions in South Texas for the business of installing, providing contract alarm services, and/or providing maintenance services in the electronic protection industry, and for those that supply such businesses, within the meaning of Section 501(c)(6) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986(the "Code"), and the Texas Tax Code, Section 11.18. In particular, the Association shall better advance the welfare of all members through the dissemination of information concerning trade practices, business conditions, technical developments and any and all related subjects of concern to the industry. The Association does not contemplate gain or profit, incidental or otherwise.

What it reported doing in 2025

The association shall better advance the welfare of all members through the dissemation of information concerning trade practices, business conditions, technical developments and any and all related subjects of concern to the industry.

Operating model

Revenue model
Membership-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 38
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 43
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 49.6%; rating input score 50
  • Program expense ratio: 18.5%; rating input score 18

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -168.4%; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 9.43; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -7.9% per year; rating input score 0; 31st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -7.8% per year; rating input score 0; 28th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 2.7% per year; rating input score 100; 48th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 49.6% of revenue deployed · 18.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2011 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 50/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 18/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 5/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.