South Shore Soccer League Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 042768029
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2021–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2020
- Location
- West Bridgewater, MA, USA
- Phone
- 6175495332
- Rating
- 80
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Human Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $345,266
- Expenses
- $317,324
- Assets
- $102,932
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
11 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DANA SANTILLI (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- EFRAIN GARCIA (DRECTOR): $13,770 total reported compensation
- NANCY ANDERTON (SECRETARY): $5,668 total reported compensation
- MARK PAUL (DIRECTOR): $4,650 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The league is organized to provide an outlet for the development of youth soccer players in the south shore region of Massachusetts. It provides a competitive league for boys and girls ages 10-19 each spring and fall and a less competitive league for ages 8 & 9. There is a league championship tournament for the competitive levels and a friendship "fun" tournament for the younger children, both held in june of each year. All teams from the league's member towns and cities are eligible to play in the league and over 7,000 children participate each year.
What it reported doing in 2024
The league has been successful in organizing competitive youth soccer competition for over 7000 older children in the south shore area of Massachusetts each spring. It has held a championship tournament each spring and the winners have moved on to the mass youth soccer assn tournament of champions where many teams have achieved success. It has also organized and successfully run a less competitive league for younger children. For those younger children it has held a friendship tournament each spring where all of the children are able to meet one another on one set of fields and compete in friendly competitions with each other and participate in other fun activities.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 99% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 83
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 63
- Sustainability: 45
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 90.5%; rating input score 90
- Program expense ratio: 98.7%; rating input score 99
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 1 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 12
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 8.1%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.32; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 8.9%; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 15.3% per year; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 4.8% per year; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 11.4% per year; rating input score 100; 69th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 90.5% of revenue deployed · 98.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 11 of 11 board members independent · 1 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $313K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $14K · 11 people listed
- Consistency: 14 of 14 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2021 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 10 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 6 of 7 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 17/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 57/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 30/100.