South Shore Rugby Football Club Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 462877026
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2019–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2018
- Location
- South Boston, MA, USA
- Rating
- 89
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Recreation& Sports N.E.C.
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $54,499
- Expenses
- $52,976
- Assets
- $112,349
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Ryan Curtis (Vice President)
- Victoria Thomas (President)
People named in this filing
- Ryan Curtis (Vice President)
- Christopher Wright-McCarthy (Treasurer)
- Kelly McGowan (Secretary)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The club has been organized to promote and compete in the sport of rugby in the South Shore of Massachusetts and on a national and international level. To encourage and foster the development and participation of the sport at all levels of play is a priority of the organization. The activities to achieve these goals will be carried out under section 5013 of the Internal Revenue Codes and under the corresponding section of any true Federal tax codes.
What it reported doing in 2025
The clubs teams participated in the spring and fall schedule of games for the New England Rugby Football Union. In support of these contests the club also provided its 115 members access to rugby training facilities as well as dedicated coaching twice a week.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 92% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 98
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 50
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 97.2%; rating input score 97
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 2.8%; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.12; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 17.1% per year; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 8.3% per year; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 15.9% per year; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 97.2% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 4 filed program accomplishments · $53K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 7 filing years from 2019 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 50/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.