South Seas Christian Ministries In

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
990267585
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2011–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2010, Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2023
Location
Honolulu, HI, USA
Phone
0808735029
Rating
38
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Protestant
Affiliation
Christianity

Reported finances

Revenue
$166,061
Expenses
$113,829
Assets
$86,446
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JACK THOMPSON (PRESIDENT)
  • DR BRAD HALL (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • REV ROB DENTON (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • NOFO ELETISE (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

People named in this filing

  • JACK THOMPSON (PRESIDENT)
  • DR BRAD HALL (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • REV ROB DENTON (VICE PRESIDENT)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

We are committed to uplifting and equipping pastors through focused teachings, seminars, and conferences. We offer practical, bible-centered training designed to deepen their faith, strengthen their leadership, and empower their ministries. These gatherings provide pastors with the tools and encouragement they need to lead their congregations with confidence and clarity.

What it reported doing in 2024

Agape home project our first "agape home" was launched to provide a safe and dignified home for avulnerable family. In 2024, we focused on preparing the site, interviewing families, and establishing policies forthe program.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 71
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 31.5%; rating input score 84; 84th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.76; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -1.9% per year; rating input score 0; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 7.4% per year; rating input score 100; 58th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -7.7% per year; rating input score 0; 13th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 12 filing years from 2011 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 50/100.