South Riding Women in Business

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
352410311
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2022–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2011
Location
Sterling, VA, USA
Rating
51
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Human Service Organizations

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,974
Expenses
$2,610
Assets
$10,835

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Ashley Ayres (President)
  • Abby Wahla (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Ashley Ayres (President)
  • Tiffany Mitchell (Treasurer)
  • Abby Wahla (Vice President)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

South Riding Women in Business SRWBs is organized exclusively for charitable and educational purposes under Section 501c3. Our mission is to empower and connect local women in business while supporting the surrounding community through scholarships fundraising volunteerism and outreach initiatives. Since rebuilding the organization in 2017 SRWBs has hosted community fundraising events including holiday events Bunco nights and planned Bingo events to raise scholarship funds for local students including graduates of Freedom High School. The organization also supports other charitable organizations through volunteer service and community donations such as assisting Women Giving Back and providing holiday baking kits for the Dulles South Food Pantry. All activities are volunteer-led and focused on community enrichment education and charitable giving.

What it reported doing in 2025

Two scholarships were awarded

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 27
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 38
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 30.4%; rating input score 30
  • Program expense ratio: 23%; rating input score 23

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -32.2%; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.15; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 37.9% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -50.2% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 5.1% per year; rating input score 100; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 30.4% of revenue deployed · 23% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $600 in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 8 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2022 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 30/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 23/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 16/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.