South Portland Football Boosters Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 262909304
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2023–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2022
- Location
- South Portland, ME, USA
- Phone
- 2076153440
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Single Organization Support
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $92,462
- Expenses
- $87,065
- Assets
- $33,186
- Liabilities
- $17
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Justin Dobson (President)
- Melanie Haynes (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Justin Dobson (President)
- Michelle Horton-Livingston (Treasurer)
- Jon Hartford (Secretary)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The South Portland Football Boosters Club was organized to help support the development of youth, middle school and high school football programs in the community of South Portland, Maine.
What it reported doing in 2024
The South Portland Football Boosters provide financial and logistical support for the K-12 football programs in the City of South Portland, Maine, through the hard work and dedication of their volunteer members. It is typical for 170-190 players to participate each year in the football programs. These programs help to mold the players in to responsible citizens of the community, through hard work and discipline, and it encourages them to help others in the community, under the leadership and involvement of the coaches and parents, through community events and fundraisers. Player registration fees, sponsorship and advertising fees, special fundraising events, apparel and concession sales and charitable contributions make up the majority of the income. The funds raised are used to assist with such things as uniform and equipment upgrade costs, coaching and officiating fees, team dinners and banquets and assistance with sports camp costs.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 44
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 5.8%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.38; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 15.4% per year; rating input score 100; 87th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 17.8% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 25/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 56/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 35/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.