South Peoria Neighborhood Connection Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 731433838
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2013–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Tulsa, OK, USA
- Phone
- 9187425597
- Rating
- 88
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Community, Neighborhood Development
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,087,667
- Expenses
- $1,370,889
- Assets
- $781,912
- Liabilities
- $51,102
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- LINDA HOLLINGSWORTH (PRESIDENT/ CHAIR)
- OLIVIA MARTIN (VICE PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- JOAN CALVERT (EXECUTIVE DIR.): $101,250 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Our mission is to empower riverwood individuals and families by reducing hunger, combating poverty, and providing a pathway to empowerment to improve lives through direct services and collaborations.
What it reported doing in 2024
During fiscal year 2025, south tulsa community house (stch) served 15,321 individuals through programs focused on food and nutrition, health and wellbeing, and pathway to empowerment services. Stch continued its mission to reduce hunger, combat poverty, and provide a pathway to empowerment through direct services and strategic community partnerships. The food & nutrition program remained the cornerstone of stch's services. During fy25, stch provided 336,960 meals to individuals and families experiencing food insecurity, including: 313,530 meals to families 12,130 meals to seniors 9,690 meals to veterans 1,235 meals to expectant mothers 375 meals to unhoused neighbors in partnership with local schools, stch also provided more than 2,000 weekend meals to students through its weekend meals initiative. Additionally, stch expanded mobile food delivery efforts through the whole foods nourishing our neighborhoods initiative, increasing access to healthy food options for families with transportation barriers.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 98% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 51% for direct work, and 49% for grants.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 87
- Transparency & Controls: 94
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 22
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 99.8%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 79.2%; rating input score 79
- Fundraising efficiency: $13.81 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -26%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.57; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.07; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 7.4%; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 11.1% per year; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 8% per year; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 6.3% per year; rating input score 100; 44th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 99.8% of revenue deployed · 79.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 11 of 11 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $1.1M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $101K · 12 people listed
- Consistency: 31 of 31 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2013 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 48/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 7/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 27/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 46/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 48/100.