South Kitsap Dance Association
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 912108104
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2023–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2022
- Location
- Port Orchard, WA, USA
- Phone
- 3607697277
- Rating
- 91
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Arts, Culture, and Humanities
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $164,474
- Expenses
- $162,090
- Assets
- $14,412
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Amanda Rother (Board President)
People named in this filing
- Nicole Cleveland (Board Treasurer)
- Amanda Rother (Board President)
- Alicia Peerson (Board Secretary)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
South Kitsap Dance Association (SKDA), also known as Synergy Dance Company, is a non-profit dance company established in 1998 to enrich the lives of the members of our community while providing children and adults with the opportunity to be a part of an organization that will teach the art of dance and performance in a fun and positive, yet disciplined environment. The program promotes self-confidence and self-discipline while providing an outlet for creation and self-expression. Our intention is to endow each student with the knowledge, skill and disciple required to fully reach their individual potential in dance and in life.
What it reported doing in 2025
Distributed funds received from donations made by the Center Plate organization to studio accounts for dance expenses. Benefiting 44.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 89% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filed totals do not add up and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 89
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 27
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 88.6%; rating input score 89
- Program expense ratio: 89.9%; rating input score 90
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 1.4%; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.09; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 51.5% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 55.3% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 27.2% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 88.6% of revenue deployed · 89.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 4 filed program accomplishments · $146K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 7 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2023 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 35/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 11/100.