South Jersey Aquatic Club
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 473425705
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2016–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Voorhees, NJ, USA
- Phone
- 8563353007
- Rating
- 80
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Swimming & Other Water Recreation
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,602,221
- Expenses
- $1,585,978
- Assets
- $37,269
- Liabilities
- $412,080
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- PETER HOLCROFT (PRESIDENT)
- SCOTT PETERS (VICE PRESIDENT/SECRETARY)
Highest reported compensation
- PETER HOLCROFT (PRESIDENT): $89,663 total reported compensation
- TIM HOLCROFT (BOARD MEMBER): $15,400 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission of sjac is to provide quality recreational and competitive swim instruction and teach overall water safety skills to all members of the community, regardless of age or ability. The long-term focus is life-long development of total mind and body health.the founding principal of sjac is that swimming should be enjoyed, not endured. This philosophy is carried across all levels of instruction, from our junior swim team to our masters program to our national competitors, and everyone in between. We strive to teach our participants skills that they can carry with them outside of the pool to live active healthy lives.south jersey aquatic club swims at the brand new nl aquatic center in voorhees and is divided into 5 programs: competitive swim team, non-competitive swim team, master's swim team, special olympics team, and home school swim team.
What it reported doing in 2024
In addition to teaching swim technique and water safety, the club strives to teach its participants skills that they can carry with them outside of the pool to live active healthy lives. The club swims at the brand-new nl aquatic center in voorhees, New Jersey and is divided into five programs: (1) sjac swim smart lessons, (2) competitive swim team, (3) non-competitive swim team, (4) master's swim team, and (5) special needs swim program. Each of the programs is described in detail below. 1. The sjac swim smart lessons the sjac swim smart lessons are geared toward the competitive swimmer. We combine individual coaching with modern technology to improve the efficiency of each stroke. With the use of underwater cameras, swim analysis software, and an endless pool, we are able to analyze and correct the individual's from every angle 2. The competitive swim team the competitive swim team is a USA swimming competitive team started by peter holcroft, an asca (american swim coaches association) level 4 swim coach. Since starting the competitive team in the fall of 2015, the team has grown to over 615 swimmers, the largest in the mid-atlantic region, and top 30 club teams in the USA. Peter has been coaching competitive swim teams and running lesson programs for almost 30 years throughout the south jersey community. He ran several ymca teams that were ranked among the top 75 teams nationwide (see pete holcroft bio for more information). Peter is the founder and president of sjac and also coaches the platinum national program. Peter based his team's training what he learned through his own competitive swimming career that balancing a medium amount of swim yardage with targeted dry-land training prevented swimmers from burning out too early and allowed them to extend their competitive swim careers. This philosophy has proven successful and has produced swimmers who have gone on to olympics, successful college competitive swimming careers, and the us national swim team. The club recognizes that not all swimmers have the desire to compete on a national level and has developed programs to accommodate everyone. Younger swimmers are divided into groups by age and skill level, bronze being the youngest group, then silver, gold, and gold select. All swimmers are encouraged to compete in every stroke at a variety of distances because it teaches them to conquer their fears, instills confidence, and encourages them to attempt all strokes instead of limiting themselves to one. As the swimmers get into high school, they are divided by skill and commitment to the sport. Those who are looking for a more disciplined program and to compete on a national level move into the national/platinum group. The senior group is for high school swimmers who may play other sports and swim in the off season, are just looking to compete and stay in shape, or just love to swim competitively but are not able to make the commitment of the platinum group. 3. The non-competitive swim team the non-competitive, or sjac ii team, began in the fall of 2015 for several reasons. The club recognizes a need to offer a program without the swim meet commitment of the competitive swim team. The club also wanted to offer younger swimmers an introduction to the world of competitive swimming. Swimmers in our bronze or silver group may attend up to four practices/week. They are encouraged to attend monthly swim meets, however, those meets are not required. We also offer a senior group for high school athletes. Finally, we have 2 developmental teams for different age groups that combine swim lessons (to develop correct swim technique) and team training (to encourage swimmers through their peers). 4. The masters team the masters team started in the fall of 2016. The masters team operates under and is registered with us masters swimming. This group is for adult athletes over the age of 18. Many individuals on the masters team are former college swimmers looking for a coached program to stay
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 98% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 89
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 62
- Sustainability: 25
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 93.1%; rating input score 93
- Program expense ratio: 94%; rating input score 94
- Fundraising efficiency: $15.49 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 71.4%; rating input score 71; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 4 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 1%; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.02; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 11.06; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 6.6%; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 7.9% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 8.2% per year; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -7.5% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 93.1% of revenue deployed · 94% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 5 of 7 board members independent · 4 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.5M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $90K · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 23 of 23 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Filing history: 9 filing years from 2016 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 7 not reported.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 51/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 39/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 48/100.