South Indian Music Academy
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 330061431
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2021–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Bellflower, CA, USA
- Phone
- 3102837485
- Rating
- 94
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $153,968
- Expenses
- $140,179
- Assets
- $169,566
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- NIRMAL NARAYAN (President)
People named in this filing
- NIRMAL NARAYAN (President)
- KALYAN RAMANATHAN (Treasurer)
- ANUPAMA GUNUPUDI (Committee)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Our mission is to deliver high-quality Carnatic music concerts by renowned artists to the LA/Orange County area. We aim to inspire our community, educate music students, and preserve the legacy of this beautiful art form. We also maintain a healthy cash balance to support and organize more community events, as well as upgrade equipment and accessories. For more information, please visit simala.net.
What it reported doing in 2025
South Indian Music Academy is dedicated to promoting and nurturing Carnatic music within the Southern California community. The Academy presents high-quality Carnatic music concerts across the Los Angeles and Orange County regions. It features accomplished and renowned artists who inspire and engage audiences of all ages. The organization is committed to preserving and promoting the rich legacy of Carnatic music for future generations. It keeps the tradition vibrant and thriving by ensuring access to world-class live performances in Southern California. The Academy also supports music education by providing platforms for students to showcase their learning through festivals and performances.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 92
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 51
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 89%; rating input score 89
- Program expense ratio: 97.6%; rating input score 98
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 9%; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.21; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 38.5% per year; rating input score 100; 87th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 33.3% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 12.2% per year; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 89% of revenue deployed · 97.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $137K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2021 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 53/100.