South End Neighborhood Tutors Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
475260073
IRS 990 coverage
2020–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2019
Location
Albany, NY, USA
Phone
5184144978
Rating
63
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Educational Services and Schools - Other

Reported finances

Revenue
$212,659
Expenses
$222,717
Assets
$176,403
Liabilities
$10,433

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • BARBARA ALBERTSPIR (PRESIDENT)
  • ERIC FAGANS (VICE PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • Diane Hester (COO): $74,292 total reported compensation
  • Carol Green (PROGRAM MANAGER): $68,865 total reported compensation
  • TONYA TERRY (COORDINATOR): $1,768 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Connecting elementary school children with caring and dedicated tutors, WIZARD'S WARDROBE'S ONE-TO-ONE TUTORING PROGRAM ENHANCES LITERACY, FOSTERS CREATIVITY AND SUPPLEMENTS CLASSROOM LEARNING IN ALBANY'S SOUTH END.

What it reported doing in 2024

Wizard's wardrobe is a free after-school one-to-one literacy tutoring program for elementary school children in albany's south end neighborhood. We pair a struggling reader with a well-trained, caring tutor who has the complete flexibility to tailor instruction to fit the learning style of their student. Our tutors are volunteers who are vetted and undergo 13 hours of initial training plus continuous supplemental training. Tutors meet with their students for two 90-minute sessions per week during the school year. Tutors work on strengthening reading, writing and problem-solving skills with a wide variety of high-quality instructional materials. Our program is quantifiably effective. None of our students read at grade level when they come to us. After one year in the program, 30% are reading on grade level. After two years, 60% are reading at at grade level. We are continuously working to expand and improve our program. For the last four years, we have fielded an odyssey of the mind (om) team comprised of wizard's wardrobe students. Om is an international competition that fosters the development of creative problem-solving skills team-based challenges. The program requires participants to work as a team to create innovative solutions to complex challenges, pulling from various fields, including science, technology, engineering, mathematics, literature, and the arts. In 2024 and 2025, our team has advanced to the state-wide competition. Last year, we launched a saturday enrichment program and took students on a fieldtrip to the museum of natural history in New York city, brought them to capital repertory theater for a story-telling event, and brought in a literacy- based magic show. Last summer, we again organized a series of field trips for our students. We traveled to the coney island aquarium, tackled the ropes course at wild play, and swam in thompson lake.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 89% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 71
  • Transparency & Controls: 78
  • Accountability: 26
  • Sustainability: 28
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 74.4%; rating input score 74
  • Program expense ratio: 71%; rating input score 71
  • Fundraising efficiency: $17.74 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 81.8%; rating input score 82; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 5 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 62
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -4.7%; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.79; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.06; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 65.1%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 57.4% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 10.9% per year; rating input score 100; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 7.8% per year; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 74.4% of revenue deployed · 71% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 0 of 7 board members independent · 5 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $223K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $74K · 10 people listed
  • Consistency: 21 of 23 current checks pass · 2 findings to review
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2020 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 7 not reported.
  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 54/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 30/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Functional expense sum did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 35/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 2/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 31/100.