South East Regional Trauma Advisory Council Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
880930471
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2022–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Allenton, WI, USA
Rating
80
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Public Health Program (Includes General Health and Wellness Promotion Services)

Reported finances

Revenue
$92,633
Expenses
$86,395
Assets
$24,359

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

12 people listed

People named in this filing

  • THOMAS R THRASH (Foundation Mgr.)
  • KELLI ANDERSON (Director)
  • LISA HASS-PETERS (Director)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The specific purposes shall include designing, implementing and evaluating a regional trauma system that is data based, confidential and sensitive to the needs, limitations and resources of the area in order to improve trauma care, including preventing injury, reducing severity of injuries and decreasing number of deaths.

What it reported doing in 2024

The corporation is organized and operated exclusively for charitable, educational and scientific purposes under 501 c 3 of the internal revenue code, or corresponding section of any future federal tax code. The specific purposes shall include designing, implementing and evaluating a regional trauma system that is data based, confidential and sensitive to the needs, limitations and resources of the area in order to improve trauma care, including preventing injury, reducing severity of injuries and decreasing number of deaths.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 81
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 39
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 79.2%; rating input score 79
  • Program expense ratio: 84.9%; rating input score 85

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 6.7%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.28; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 9.1% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 16.8% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 61.6% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 79.2% of revenue deployed · 84.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $73K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 20/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 57/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.