South Dakota Snow Queen Festival Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
481281981
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2009–2021
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2021
Location
Aberdeen, SD, USA
Phone
9207370621
Rating
41
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Fairs

Reported finances

Revenue
$53,893
Expenses
$54,383
Assets
$48,546

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DAWN BREMER (PRESIDENT)
  • ELIZABETH FLANNERY (VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • DAWN BREMER (PRESIDENT)
  • ELIZABETH FLANNERY (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • JESSICA HANSON (AMBASSADOR ELECT)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

South Dakota senior snow queen is held to provide girls between the age of 17-21 the opportunity to enhance their personal and life skills the girls compete for scholarships and the opportunity to be ambassadors to their hometown and South Dakota while on their travels and performing thier duties throughout the year. The South Dakota junior snow queen is held to provide younger girls usually high school freshman, the opportunity to enhance their personal and life skills. A total of $5,500 was given in scholarships to the winners in 2021.

What it reported doing in 2021

South Dakota snow queen festival inc was started to provide an opportunity for young women in South Dakota to serve as ambassadors for the state of South Dakota.we provide girls between the ages of 17-21 the opportunity to enhance their personal and life skills. The girls compete for scholarships and the opportunity to be ambassadors to their hometown and South Dakota while on theirtravels and performing their duties. South Dakota junior snow queen festival is held to provide younger girls, usually high school freshman, the opportunity to enhance their personal and life skills. The organization did not during the year, recieve any fund directly or indirectly, to pay premiums on a personal benefit contract.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 69% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 10
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 35
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 10.2%; rating input score 10
  • Program expense ratio: 10.1%; rating input score 10

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -0.9%; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.89; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -10.6% per year; rating input score 0; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -2.2% per year; rating input score 0; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 27.3% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 10.2% of revenue deployed · 10.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $6K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2009 to 2021
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 10/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 10/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 37/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 36/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.