South Dakota Education Equity Coalition
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 880727247
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2022–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Black Hawk, SD, USA
- Phone
- 4028674241
- Rating
- 73
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Education
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $870,419
- Expenses
- $1,129,951
- Assets
- $1,858,583
- Liabilities
- $31,634
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- SARAH WHITE (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- SARAH WHITE (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $149,985 total reported compensation
- JAYE CONRAD (DIRECTOR OF FINANCE): $85,785 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The sdeec envisions a day when indigenous youth living in South Dakota have access to innovative, equitable, and inclusive educational environments so they can grow, thrive, exercise self-determination with audacity, and be unapologetically who they are.
What it reported doing in 2025
The South Dakota education equity coalition (sdeec) exists to empower indigenous communities to effectively navigate public institutions in order to close achievement gaps and provide more culturally relevant educational opportunities for indigenous kids. We produce research, provide training, conduct policy analysis, and convene our partners and allies to accomplish our goals and advance our mission. We believe an important root cause in the education outcome disparity between indigenous students and other students in South Dakota is the lack of formal consultation between the public education system in our state and tribal education directors from the nine tribal communities. In order to address this root cause, we worked to develop and build support for a first of its kind tribal accord to support the improvement of indigenous education in our state. We convened our partners, allies, and supporters. We also provided trainings for our partners and allies. We accomplished the following in 2025: hundreds of students participated in the ball on the mall program in july and august 2025. The program was a partnership between sdeec and the rapid city police. Students traveled to the state capitol in pierre and were introduced to all members of the state house and state senate. With support from the sdeec, seven students attended an education evolving conference in minneapolis and were able to present at a panel discussion in front of all of the attendees. The sdeec provided trainings for hundreds of teachers, students, parents, tribal education directors, and education experts to help them understand how to navigate public boards, task forces, councils, and the state legislature. The sdeec convened our partners and allies virtually each month to share information about public policy, plan together, hear from guest speakers, and exchange information. We hosted an in-person retreat in rapid city with dozens of attendees. The retreats featured panels, presentations, round table discussions, training, guest speakers, and interactive planning sessions. The retreats also provided attendees opportunities to network, connect with fellow education advocates, and share information about their work. Planned the first ever capitol day for indigenous students to travel to the state capitol in pierre. Developed a pilot tribal accord concept for use in rapid city area schools and the sioux falls school district.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 99% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 69
- Transparency & Controls: 74
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 27
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 81.6%; rating input score 82
- Program expense ratio: 62.8%; rating input score 63
- Fundraising efficiency: $7.59 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -29.8%; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.64; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 20.9%; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 29.7% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -15.2% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 26.2% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 81.6% of revenue deployed · 62.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 6 of 6 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $710K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $150K · 8 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $112K reported
- Consistency: 31 of 31 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2022 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 26/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 4/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 58/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 15/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 55/100.