South County Minority Achievement Committee

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
813096702
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2016–2021
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2021
Location
Lorton, VA, USA
Phone
5713546226
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Student Services, Organizations of Students

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$0
Expenses
$402
Assets
$6,532
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

People named in this filing

  • Kidada Bivins (Chair)
  • Shirley Norman-Taylor (Vice-Chair)
  • Golda Hector (Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The Mission of the South County Minority Achievement Committee is to understand and help eliminate achievement and opportunity gaps in the under-represented minority community. The goals and objectives we have for the South County students and community are to: 1. Attain higher academic achievement, 2. Increase parent and community awareness/involvement, 3. Improve achievement assessment scores, 4. Increase enrollment in honors and advanced placement courses, 5. Increase student leadership and extra-curricular participation, 6. Develop student readiness & preparedness for college or the workforce, and 7. Establish & implement programs, policies, and strategies that have a positive impact on the achievement of minorities and all South County students.

What it reported doing in 2021

Did not hold any MAC Scholars Program sessions during the 2021-20222 school year. The sessions were canceled due to the impact of COVID19. Sessions including free tutoring to South County Students and academic enrichment presentations during the sessions. The Board is trying to determine how to move forward post COVID19.

Operating model

Revenue model
No positive adjusted resources. The filing reports no positive adjusted operating resources.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 42
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: Limited
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 16.25; rating input score 93; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -50.5% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -56.8% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 11.1% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2016 to 2021
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.