South Coast Wildlands

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
912074096
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2013–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2012, Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2023
Location
Fair Oaks, CA, USA
Phone
8779453526
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Environmental Education and Outdoor Survival Programs

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$115,175
Expenses
$93,254
Assets
$26,902

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • PAUL EDELMMAN (PRESIDENT)
  • CAM TREDENNICK (VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • PAUL EDELMMAN (PRESIDENT)
  • CAM TREDENNICK (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • AMY GOLDEN (SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Our mission is to protect and restore systems of connected wildlands that support native wildlife and the ecosystems on which they rely.

What it reported doing in 2024

Sc wildlands is an environmental nonprofit organization that works with a wide variety of stakeholders across diverse disciplines to conserve wildlife movement corridors. With 20 years of experience in science-based design of wildlife linkages, sc wildlands is widely recognized as one of the leading providers of such services. Our 2024 programs included California missing linkage 25th anniversary symposium, i-5 connectivity working group, greater i-10 linkage implementation workshop, and transportation vulnerability and wildlife connectivity assessment.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 49
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 19%; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.29; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -16.9% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -21.6% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 10 filing years from 2013 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 25/100.