South Central Health Care Foundation Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 640823039
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2019–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2018, Form 990-N 2014
- Location
- Laurel, MS, USA
- Phone
- 6013990519
- Rating
- 49
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Single Organization Support
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $67,261
- Expenses
- $17,184
- Assets
- $98,761
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- BECKY BREWER (PRESIDENT)
- MARY DAVIS (VICE-PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- MARY DAVIS (VICE-PRESIDENT): $65,934 total reported compensation
- JOANN TREST (SECRETARY): $48,215 total reported compensation
- SHERETTA SEWARD (TREASURER): $38,028 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
South central health care foundation, inc.'s primary mission is to provide services to south central regional medical center, a 501(c)3 governmental entity and the related medical community.
What it reported doing in 2024
Promotion of health for the community of south central regional medical center through charitable giving and education.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 56% for direct work, and 44% for grants.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of voting board members are independent.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 26
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 28
- Sustainability: 68
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 14.1%; rating input score 14
- Program expense ratio: 55.2%; rating input score 55
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 25%; rating input score 25; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 3 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 33
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 74.5%; rating input score 95; 95th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 5.75; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: Limited
Growth
- Program expense growth: -30.7% per year; rating input score 0; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 0.9% per year; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -1.3% per year; rating input score 0; 34th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 14.1% of revenue deployed · 55.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 1 of 4 board members independent · 3 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $9K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $66K · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 16 of 16 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2019 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 14/100.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 25/100.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 55/100.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 6 of 9 not reported.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 52/100.