South Central Collaborative

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
872082139
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2023–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2022
Location
Phoenix, AZ, USA
Phone
6022527852
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Community, Neighborhood Development

Reported finances

Expenses
$11,263
Assets
$7,309

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JEFFREY WALKER (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • JEFFREY WALKER (PRESIDENT)
  • FRANCISCA MONTOYA (SECRETARY, T)
  • JOSE VAQUERA (SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The corporation is organized and shall be operated exclusively for charitable and educational purposes within the meaning of i.r.c. 501(c) (3). These purposes shall include, but not be limited to, successfully implementing the south central four initiatives: gentrification & displacement reduction; infrastructure; multi-generational wealth building; and workforce development in and around the south central corridor of phoenix, Arizona. The corporation may carry out its purposes directly or by making gifts, grants or other payments to other qualified organizations.

What it reported doing in 2025

Workforce development & wealth building. Create and implement the developer mentorship program. Recruit, train, and mentor south central corridor community members and business owners to become professional affordable housing designers and non-profit and for- profit affordable housing developers.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 38
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 19
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: Limited
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.65; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -83.1% per year; rating input score 0; 11th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -96.4% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -33.1% per year; rating input score 0; 20th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 4 filed program accomplishments · $11K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 3 of 3 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2023 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 43/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 51/100.