South Carolina Physicians Care Charity Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 570787036
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Chapin, SC, USA
- Phone
- 8039203284
- Rating
- 84
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,044,962
- Expenses
- $818,118
- Assets
- $20,271,653
- Liabilities
- $5,903
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- Warren J McCormack (Executive Dir.): $91,704 total reported compensation
- Herbert B Niestat MD (Chairman): $6,000 total reported compensation
- Randall Neil (Secretary): $6,000 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The sc physicians care charity provides grants to other non-profit organizations with missions that promote health and wellness through their various projects within the borders of South Carolina.
What it reported doing in 2025
Human Services and Childrens WelfareThe Central Community Foundation (One SC Fund) received a grant ($100,000.00) to be used for the statewide Hurricane Helene Relief response.The Charleston Hope organization received a grant of ($5,000.00) for three high-impact trauma-informed training sessions attended by educators, internal mental health staff, and school-based coordinators.A grant of ($18,479.00) was made to the Childrens Advocacy Center of Spartanburg, Cherokee, & Union counties to make interior and exterior renovations to your buildings. The renovations include: painting, wood replacement, floor sealing, landscaping, new office chairs and fixtures, and replacement of a childrens lobby computer.The Healthy Learners received a grant of ($60,000.00) to purchase vans used to transport children to medical appointments.The Orangeburg Council on Aging received a grant of ($50,000.00) to operate the home delivered meal program for the elderly. This program provides balanced nutritional meals to those in the senior population who struggle with food insecurity.Screaming Eagles Special Needs Athletics was provided a grant ($35,000) to construct an ADA compliant restroom facility adjacent to the athletic fields on the organizations property. The Screaming Eagles Special Needs Athletic organization operates a community hub in Newbery County, where they host support groups, educational workshops, and provide respite services for families facing special needs health challenges.The Ark of SC is an organization that supports families and individuals who experience Alzheimers and dementia. This organization received a grant of ($28,098.59) to replace the facilitys roof which has outlived its anticipated life cycle.The Florence Crittenton Programs of South Carolina received a grant of ($100,000.00) to support its ongoing mission of serving pregnant and parenting young women across the state. This organization provides critical programs and resources designed to foster stability, personal growth, and improved outcomes for both mothers and their children.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Investment-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from recurring investment income.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 86% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 84
- Transparency & Controls: 87
- Accountability: 86
- Sustainability: 75
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 84.8%; rating input score 85
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 90.9%; rating input score 91; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 99.2%; rating input score 99; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 67
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 21.7%; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 24.78; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 14.8%; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 4.7% per year; rating input score 100; 35th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -7.5% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 5.2% per year; rating input score 100; 36th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 84.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 5 of 5 board members independent · 6 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $694K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $92K · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 22 of 23 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules · includes grants
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2010 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 20 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 13 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 8 not reported.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 25/100.