South Carolina HIV Task Force

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
465475844
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2016–2019
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2019, Form 990-N 2015
Location
Lexington, SC, USA
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
AIDS

Reported finances

Revenue
$-260
Expenses
$7,535
Assets
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • K Allen Campbell (President)
  • Eunika Simmons (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • K Allen Campbell (President)
  • Eunika Simmons (Vice President)
  • Kimberly Butler Willis (Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Our foremost goal is to advocate for the preservation, expansion andstrengthening of HIV prevention, care, treatment, support and educationservices in South Carolina as well as the advancement of civil and humanrights for people affected by HIV/AIDS.we pursue our goals by working on the following objectives:-determine annual policy priorities.-monitoring and influencing public policy concerning persons living withhiv/AIDS.-develop and implement HIV/AIDS advocacy strategies.-raise public awareness of HIV/AIDS issues within South Carolina.-inform elected and appointed officials and other key decision makers, thegeneral public, and fellow task force members about needed HIV/AIDS statepolicy.-conduct an annual legislative action event at our state capitol.-develop and implement plans to increase task force membership thatembraces the diversity within our state and is representative of south caroliniansliving with HIV/AIDS.

What it reported doing in 2019

Entity has ceased operations and liquidated assets as of 12/16/2019. No operations occurred during 2019 except to pay obligations in preparation for ceasing operations effective 12/16/2019, and distributing remaining assets in connection with entity's program purpose and to pay off existing liabilities and known costs associated dissolution.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 19
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 8
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: 50.5%; rating input score 51

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -2,998.1%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -52.9% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -58.4% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -86.9% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 50.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $4K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2016 to 2019
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 51/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 1/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.