South Carolina Gastroenterology Association
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 571103614
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2021–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2020
- Location
- Sullivans Island, SC, USA
- Phone
- 8435303482
- Rating
- 68
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Chambers of Commerce & Business Leagues
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $178,744
- Expenses
- $116,852
- Assets
- $175,352
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
10 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- SHANNON JOHNSON (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
- CHRISTOPHER FYOCK (PRESIDENT)
- JOSH WATSON (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- SHANNON JOHNSON (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
- CHRISTOPHER FYOCK (PRESIDENT)
- JOSH WATSON (VICE PRESIDENT)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Our purpose is to promote the digestive health of south carolinians, to foster the development and fellowship of physicians and medical professionals who have similar interests in the practice of gastroenterology and endoscopy, and to maintain the highest standard of clinical practice in the field of gastroenterology and endoscopy.
What it reported doing in 2025
Host annual conference & board meetings designed to promote and maintain the highest standards of clinical practice in the field of gastroenterology and endoscopy
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 76% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 54
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 71
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 45.1%; rating input score 45
- Program expense ratio: 68.4%; rating input score 68
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 34.6%; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.5; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 39.7%; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 42.3% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 24.7% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 33.5% per year; rating input score 100; 87th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 45.1% of revenue deployed · 68.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $80K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 1 filed schedules
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2021 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 45/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 8/100.