South Carolina Council of Teachers of Mathematics

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
570675337
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2016–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2020
Location
Sumter, SC, USA
Phone
8037209148
Rating
72
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Secondary, High School

Reported finances

Revenue
$179,837
Expenses
$158,591
Assets
$177,464
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

17 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Cynthia Parker (Executive Director)
  • Eugene Bellamy Jr (Past- President)
  • Alisa Hobgood (Assistant IT and Executive Director)
  • Brantay Cohens (President)

People named in this filing

  • Cynthia Parker (Executive Director)
  • William Gillam (IT Manager and Webmaster)
  • Eugene Bellamy Jr (Past- President)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The primary purpose of the South Carolina Council of Teachers of Mathematics is to support and advance high-quality mathematics education throughout South Carolina. SCCTM provides premier professional development for educators through conferences, workshops, and instructional resources. SCCTM offers scholarships and classroom teacher grants and supports the state's high school math team to strengthen teaching and learning statewide.

What it reported doing in 2025

SCCTM conducted Mathematics Ambassadors and Fellows Workshops in Columbia and virtually, benefiting 30-40 educators during each session, preparing future leaders in mathematics education through advanced professional development. Ambassadors attended the annual conference and continue to promote their newfound knowledge and practices within their school districts. SCCTM's goal is to have an SCCTM Mathematics Ambassador in every school district in the state.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 89% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 93% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Expenses are high relative to revenue and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 63
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 57
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 60.3%; rating input score 60
  • Program expense ratio: 68.4%; rating input score 68

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 11.8%; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.12; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 16.5%; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 10.1% per year; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 5.8% per year; rating input score 100; 48th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 3.9% per year; rating input score 100; 39th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 60.3% of revenue deployed · 68.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $108K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 17 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 9 filing years from 2016 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 59/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 19/100.