South Berwick Emergency Ambulance & Rescue Service
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 237050411
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2012
- Forms available
- Form 990 2012
- Location
- South Berwick, ME, USA
- Phone
- 2073842300
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Ambulance, Emergency Medical Transport Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $386,566
- Expenses
- $424,672
- Assets
- $106,772
- Liabilities
- $113,857
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2012. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2012. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
We provide emergency ambulance services and medical treatment to the towns of South Berwick, Maine and Rollinsford, NH utilizing both volunteer and paid, professional EMT staff. We also have a large presence in the community working with local fire and police departments and teaching CPR and basic life saving skills.
What it reported doing in 2012
We provided emergency ambulance services and medical treatment to the towns of South Berwick, ME and Rollinsford, NH utilizing both volunteer and paid, professional EMT staff. We also provided, upon request, emergency ambulance transportion of patients to area hospitals or emergency facilities, first aid assistance and/or rescue services in the event of an accident or to aid in the search for lost or missing persons in the surrounding communities. In addition, we work with local fire and police departments in the teaching of CPR and other life saving skills.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 67% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 86
- Accountability: 25
- Sustainability: 21
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 91.7%; rating input score 92; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 25%; rating input score 25; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 2 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 25
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -9.9%; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.25; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.07; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 2%; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 8.8% per year; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -40.3% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: 1 of 4 board members independent · 2 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $394K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $7K · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 24 of 25 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2010 to 2012
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 25/100.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 7 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 22/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 15/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 7/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 46/100.