South Bend Medical Services Corp

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
204223783
IRS 990 coverage
2013–2020
Forms available
Form 990 2020
Location
South Bend, IN, USA
Phone
5746313793
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Community Health Systems

Reported finances

Revenue
$0
Expenses
$3,227
Assets
$24,794
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

2 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • RUDOLPH M NAVARI (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • RUDOLPH M NAVARI (PRESIDENT)
  • MELISSA TAKACH (TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The south bend medical services corporation is a medical training facility, non-profit corporation, established for the purpose of providing medical education training, research and services to use, distribute and apply its income and assets, either directly or indirectly or through any charitable, benevolent or educational institution, association or agency as the directors may at any time determine. The south bend medical services corporation contracts with physicians and physician groups to provide services and perform duties related to medical education at the medical training facility.

What it reported doing in 2020

To receive and maintain funds and apply the income and principal thereof to promote the well being of mankind in Indiana and throughout the world; to develop, as means to that end, specialized diagnostic and medical services and to promote and advance clinical studies, bio-medical research and teaching; to maintain and develop medical research facilities; and to establish and maintain charitable, benevolent and bio-medical research activities which shall further the purposes set forth above. To purchase or finance the acquisition of facilities and equipment necessary to undertake the corporate purposes.

Operating model

Revenue model
No positive adjusted resources. The filing reports no positive adjusted operating resources.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 75
  • Transparency & Controls: 90
  • Accountability: 70
  • Sustainability: 32
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 2 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 29
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: Limited
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 7.68; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 21.1% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -49.4% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -15.9% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 2 of 2 board members independent · 2 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $3K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 2 people listed
  • Consistency: 13 of 13 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 8 filing years from 2013 to 2020
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 6 not reported.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 57/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.