SoulBridge
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 393671539
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2025–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Knoxville, TN, USA
- Rating
- 50
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Health Support Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $7,038
- Expenses
- $5,635
- Assets
- $1,403
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Chris Blough (President)
- Monica Nelson (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Chris Blough (President)
- Monica Nelson (Vice President)
- Derek Faircloth (Treasurer)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
SoulBridge exists to bridge the gap between communities and healthcare by equipping organizations, providers, and individuals with accessible, high-quality services. Through a collaborative network of professionals, strategic partnerships, and innovative outreach, we strive to ensure that individuals and families, especially in underserved and rural areas, receive the support they need to thrive.
What it reported doing in 2025
SoulBridge was founded as a nonprofit organization in August 2026. Monthly board meetings began in October 2026, and the two co-founders were established as co-directors for the organization. With the mission of increasing access to healthcare in underserved communities, SoulBridge established formal agreements with 3 community organizations for allowing counseling services to be provided on-site in Knox and Loudon counties. Additionally, SoulBridge provided two continuing education events for local mental health providers and co-sponsored a third event during the Fall of 2026.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 30
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 47
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 27.5%; rating input score 27
- Program expense ratio: 34.3%; rating input score 34
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 19.9%; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.25; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 27.5% of revenue deployed · 34.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $2K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 27/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 34/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 21/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.