Soteria Precision Medicine Foundation Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 820642928
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2020–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025, Form 990-EZ 2019
- Location
- San Diego, CA, USA
- Phone
- 8582047322
- Rating
- 74
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Health Treatment Facilities, Primarily Outpatient
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $457,323
- Expenses
- $847,127
- Assets
- $356,378
- Liabilities
- $78,136
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Julia Civardi (CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- Julia Civardi (CEO): $173,000 total reported compensation
- Amanda Skeen (COO): $113,000 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Soteria Precision Medicine Foundation is dedicated to empowering patients and physicians with personalized precision medicine solutions.
What it reported doing in 2025
Soteria precision medicine - the organization's first program focuses on developing, maintaining and offering a digital platform for patients, physicians and medical institutions.In 2024, the Organization partnered with the Translational Genomics Research Institute (TGen) to develop a patient navigation and research initiative serving Special Operations Forces (SOF) members facing a cancer diagnosis. In 2025, the Organization advanced this initiative through the launch of Cancer Hunt, a precision medicine navigation program designed to provide genomic testing, biomarker interpretation to inform treatment selection, and personalized cancer navigation to SOF members and the broader U.S. military veteran community. The program emphasizes continuity of care before, during, and after a cancer diagnosis, and leverages a coordinated approach to early detection, advanced diagnostics, treatment navigation, and survivorship support. While the program prioritizes SOF members including combat operators, aviation and aircrew, combat service personnel, enablers, and interagency partners any U.S. military veteran facing a cancer diagnosis is eligible for support.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 97% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 77
- Transparency & Controls: 79
- Accountability: 68
- Sustainability: 10
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 63.2%; rating input score 63
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Pass
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 60%; rating input score 60; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -85.2%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.42; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.22; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 33.8%; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 14.4% per year; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 22.2% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 32.7% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 63.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 3 of 5 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $535K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $173K · 5 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 3 contractors listed · $394K reported
- Consistency: 24 of 24 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2020 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 2/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 22/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 9/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 16/100.