Sos Ministries Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 300127524
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Montgomery, TX, USA
- Phone
- 8774842632
- Rating
- 76
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Standard
- Sector
- International Cultural Exchange
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $3,769,561
- Expenses
- $3,854,055
- Assets
- $2,412,626
- Liabilities
- $1,296
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
16 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- SHANNON HURLEY (President)
- DEL SEEHUSEN (Vice President)
Highest reported compensation
- SHANNON HURLEY (President): $120,395 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Sos ministries inc exists to support the ministry of sos uganda through accountability and the developing and sustaining of ministry partners
What it reported doing in 2024
Sos ministries inc funded grants to sos ministries uganda, which was used to host biblical training conferences, leadership development programs, community programs, infrastructure development, educational development, and humanitarian aid to the people of uganda.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 96% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 70% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and the filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 90
- Transparency & Controls: 81
- Accountability: 45
- Sustainability: 38
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 94.4%; rating input score 94
- Program expense ratio: 92.2%; rating input score 92
- Fundraising efficiency: $28.83 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: 1 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 12
- Claims monitoring procedures: Pass
- Requires narrative reports: Fail
- Conducts field audits: Fail
- May suspend future funding: Fail
- Requires financial reports: Fail
- Conducts site visits: Fail
- Requires grant agreements: Fail
- May require repayment: Fail
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 68.8%; rating input score 69; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 1 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 12
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -2.2%; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.63; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 93; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 3.1%; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 14.8% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 15.1% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 18.5% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 94.4% of revenue deployed · 92.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 11 of 16 board members independent · 1 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $3.6M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $120K · 16 people listed
- Consistency: 26 of 26 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and foreign activity
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2011 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 6 of 7 not reported.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight: 7 of 8 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 26/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 23/100.