Soroptimist Intl of Truckee Meadows
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 880152162
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2011–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2022, Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Reno, NV, USA
- Phone
- 7757420627
- Rating
- 32
- Verdict
- REVIEW
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Protection Against Abuse
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $135,153
- Expenses
- $127,159
- Assets
- $177,791
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
11 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MARILYN PEARSON (CO-PRESIDENT)
- LISA ROBINSON (CO-PRESIDENT)
- HOLLY NASH (PRESIDENT ELECT)
- MARY ANN MACCAULEY (VICE PRESIDENT-PROGRAM)
- BILLIE MENDIOLA (VICE PRESIDENT-MEMBERSHIP)
People named in this filing
- MARILYN PEARSON (CO-PRESIDENT)
- LISA ROBINSON (CO-PRESIDENT)
- HOLLY NASH (PRESIDENT ELECT)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Empowering with access to education
What it reported doing in 2024
Presented 12 scholarships for women, 4 graduate and 8 undergraduate, primarily for women who have interrupted their education and wish to return to school. In addition, presented 4 live your dream scholarships to women heads of households who are enrolled in vocational training or undergraduate degree.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 0
- Transparency & Controls: 65
- Sustainability: 60
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
- Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 80%; rating input score 80; 0th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 5.9%; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.4; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -19% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 0.3% per year; rating input score 100; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 2.5% per year; rating input score 100; 36th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 11 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2011 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 50/100.