Soroptimist International of the Americas Inc Club 116701 Truckee Donner

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
237173782
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2020–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Truckee, CA, USA
Phone
5305501433
Rating
48
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$126,543
Expenses
$112,756
Assets
$115,314
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • SHIRLEY PHELAN (PRESIDENT)
  • MARCY ALSTOTT (PRESIDENT ELECT)

People named in this filing

  • SHIRLEY PHELAN (PRESIDENT)
  • MARCY ALSTOTT (PRESIDENT ELECT)
  • NANCY DAVIS (TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Betterment of women and girls

What it reported doing in 2024

Ruby award $500, violet richardson award $600, youth appreciation luncheon $270, sex trafficing programs $3027, journeys within our community $2000, meals on wheels $1500, best of women celebration $-176, high school girls sports teams $7100, july 4th parade $500, truckee community theater $500, headwaters science institute $2735, stepp $1500, north tahoe homeless sevices $2000, truckee high school model un $1000, truckee roundhouse kids camp $2500, founders pennies $418, sia club giving $250, snr foundation $50, kidzone museum $1500, truckee hs scholarships $5000, teen closet $410, la fuerza latina $500, truckee school district vision program $2500, hike for hope $2000, mariposa club $1000, red cross disaster $174

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 62
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0.1%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0.1%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 10.9%; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.02; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 80% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 21.8% per year; rating input score 100; 85th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 13.2% per year; rating input score 100; 69th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0.1% of revenue deployed · 0.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 4 filed program accomplishments · $86 in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2020 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.