Sons of Amvets Squadron 116

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
994881846
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2024–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Stockton, MO, USA
Phone
4172763414
Rating
63
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$6,280
Expenses
$6,200
Assets
$348
Liabilities
$268

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

People named in this filing

  • MILES BRITE (SQUADRON COMMANDER)
  • DANIEL PALMER (COMMANDER AMVETS POST 116)
  • KAROL THORNHILL (SQUADRON ADJUTANT)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

501(c)(3) organization -community engagement, and patriotic service. The squadron actively contributed to the welfare of veterans by raising funds and providing support for several veteran-focused programs. A primary focus of our charitable work was to support honor flights of the ozarks, which provides world war ii, korean war, and vietnam war veterans with an all-expenses-paid trip to Washington, d.c., to visit the memorials dedicated to their service and sacrifice. The squadron organized fundraising events, partnered with local businesses, and engaged the community to generate financial and volunteer support for this cause.

What it reported doing in 2024

Honor flights of the ozarks

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 99% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Transfer-based 990-EZ. The 990-EZ reports grants or member benefits, but it does not separate enough spending to show the nonprofit’s full delivery mix.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 58
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 33
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 93.3%; rating input score 93
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 1.3%; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.06; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.77; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 93.3% of revenue deployed
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 9/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 48/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 7/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.