Somos Mayfair Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
770499813
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
San Jose, CA, USA
Phone
4082516900
Rating
78
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Neighborhood, Block Associations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$5,982,070
Expenses
$5,970,208
Assets
$4,001,847
Liabilities
$952,983

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

17 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • SAUL RAMOS (CO-EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
  • VICTOR H DUARTE-VASQUEZ (CO-EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • SAUL RAMOS (CO-EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $171,105 total reported compensation
  • VICTOR H DUARTE-VASQUEZ (CO-EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $160,551 total reported compensation
  • ANDREA PORTILLO (DIRECTOR OF ORGANIZING & POLICY): $122,148 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Somos mayfair's mission is to support children, organizes families, and connect neighbors to uplift the dreams, power, and leadership of community and address systemic inequities.

What it reported doing in 2024

Early school success: finally, our family resource center (frc) team had another impactful year, beginning with the successful implementation of bridge to kinder in partnership with arusd. This program was offered at both linda vista and san antonio elementary schools, with 65 students enrolled at each site. To further support the healthy development of these young learners, we completed 46 ages and stages questionnaires, allowing us to better track and respond to each child's growth needs. This year also saw the exciting launch of los compadres, a program dedicated to engaging fathers in the community. We are proud to currently have 7 active leaders, with programming designed to address important topics such as domestic violence, child abuse prevention, raising lgbtq+ children, and mental health. In partnership with the palo alto junior museum, our painter frc site began offering quarterly programming that introduces children and their families to different animals and learning opportunities. Additionally, we launched saturday programming at both of our frc sites, focusing on key areas such as medical enrollment, art and wellness, and health and nutrition. Overall, through these and other initiatives, our frcs have served more than 1,224 participants this year. Our parentchild+ program has been a cornerstone of these services, delivering over 8,000 home visits to families. The program currently has 30 caregivers and 33 children enrolled, with 15 children and their caregivers graduating last september. We have also created new opportunities for caregivers through the be strong families parent cafe series, which brought together 15 parents to share their stories and build a sense of community. This series was integrated with our monthly parentchild+ connections meetings, further connecting participants to the larger network of support within the frc. Our developmental support for children has also been robust, as we administered 167 ages and stages questionnaires (asq-3 and asq-se) throughout the year. These assessments were conducted at the beginning, middle, and end of the program to track developmental progress and set personalized goals for each child. As a result, we were able to make over 10 referrals for children to receive specialized services where needed, ensuring they get the support necessary for healthy development.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 75
  • Transparency & Controls: 70
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 30
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 77.4%; rating input score 77
  • Program expense ratio: 77%; rating input score 77
  • Fundraising efficiency: $16.93 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 0.2%; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.67; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.24; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 14.9%; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 15.7% per year; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 13.3% per year; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 15.7% per year; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 77.4% of revenue deployed · 77% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 10 of 10 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $4.6M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $171K · 17 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $121K reported
  • Consistency: 29 of 29 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
  • Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 7 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 55/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 34/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 24/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 19/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 40/100.