Solomon R. Guggenheim Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
135562233
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
Location
New York, NY, USA
Phone
2123604216
Rating
69
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Art Museums

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$88,200,362
Expenses
$84,882,538
Assets
$230,239,605
Liabilities
$107,434,102

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

39 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MARTINE WESTERMANN (DIRECTOR/CEO)
  • DIMITRIS DASKALOPOULOS (TRUSTEE/VICE-PRESIDENT (THRU 09/24))
  • CHARLES M DIKER (TRUSTEE/VICE-PRESIDENT)
  • THOMAS R ELLIS (TRUSTEE/VICE-PRESIDENT)
  • WENDY FISHER (TRUSTEE/PRESIDENT)
  • WENDY L-J MCNEIL (TRUSTEE/VICE-PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • MARTINE WESTERMANN (DIRECTOR/CEO): $946,303 total reported compensation
  • RICHARD ARMSTRONG (DIRECTOR EMERITUS): $737,425 total reported compensation
  • MARTHA WITHINGTON (DEP DIR, CFO AND INTERIM COO): $533,337 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The Solomon R. Guggenheim Foundation promotes the understanding and appreciation of art, architecture, and other manifestations of visual culture, primarily through the operation of museums and educational programs.

What it reported doing in 2024

Disseminating current scholarship and promoting learning are the primary goals of the many exhibition and collection catalogues produced by the foundation. Publications present scholarly and instructive art historical information in the form of essays that contextualize art within larger movements or disciplines; in-depth discussions of individual artworks; interviews with artists and reference tools such as bibliographies, biographies, chronologies, and exhibition histories. Publications in 2024 included jenny holzer: trace; only the young: experimental art in korea: 1960s - 1970s; going dark: the contemporary figure at the edge of visibility; and harmony and dissonance: orphism in paris, 1910-1930.significant exhibition, collections, education, audio, video, and catalogue archives content is available to the public, free of charge, on guggenheim.org including more than 1,900 artworks by more than 625 artists in the collection online. In 2024 the foundation published 5 new videos and 197 new audio tracks, bringing the total videos available on the site to 621 and audio tracks to approximately 2,052.additionally, in 2024, the foundation published 8 new blog posts offering insights into exhibitions, contemporary art, global culture, and museum archives and history, bringing the total number of posts available online to 1,120. In 2024, guggenheim.org recorded 4,235,570 user sessions and 22,459,067 page views. The guggenheim remains committed to creating a welcoming experience for all visitors both onsite and online. The guggenheim digital guide, available on the bloomberg connects app, continues to provide rich engagement for audiences. Verbal descriptions are a central feature of this experience and support accessibility and inclusive storytelling.in 2024, more than 40 new verbal description tracks were created for the exhibitions jenny holzer: light line; by way of: material and motion in the guggenheim collection; harmony and dissonance: orphism in paris, 1910-1930; and collection in focus: piet mondrian: ever further.recognizing that many of the museum's visitors are international, the museum remains committed to a comprehensive translation strategy. In 2024, italian was added as a primary translation language, alongside spanish, and the museum also integrated bloomberg connects' google translate feature to broaden multilingual access to text-based content.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and most voting board members are independent. The filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad and the filing does not identify recipients for some grant dollars.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 65
  • Transparency & Controls: 59
  • Accountability: 98
  • Sustainability: 51
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 71.4%; rating input score 71
  • Program expense ratio: 66.4%; rating input score 66
  • Fundraising efficiency: $6.54 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 90%; rating input score 90; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 5 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 83
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Pass
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Scored; rating input score 0
  • Grant itemization coverage: Scored; rating input score 0
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 96.3%; rating input score 96; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 3.8%; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.71; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.47; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 5.8%; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -1.3% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 0.8% per year; rating input score 100; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 3.2% per year; rating input score 100; 22nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 4 operating locations identified
  • Where the money goes: 71.4% of revenue deployed · 66.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 26 of 27 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $56.4M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $946K · 39 people listed · 5 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $6.2M reported
  • Consistency: 44 of 45 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 10 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 12 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight scored 0/100.
  • High — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 29/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 51/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 12/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 39/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Schedule R controlled transactions itemized did not reconcile in the filed values.