Society of the Third Street Music School Settlement
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 135596825
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- New York, NY, USA
- Phone
- 2127773240
- Rating
- 84
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Performing Arts Schools
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $12,056,559
- Expenses
- $11,918,670
- Assets
- $25,430,381
- Liabilities
- $4,173,444
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
38 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ANDREA DIPASQUALE (VICE PRESIDENT)
- ARIEL FAUSTO (VICE PRESIDENT)
- MATTHEW L SPERLING (VICE PRESIDENT)
- VALERIE LEWIS (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- VALERIE LEWIS (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $326,885 total reported compensation
- SEEROJNEE HENRY (DIRECTOR OF FINANCE & ADMINISTRATION): $213,475 total reported compensation
- LOYI MALU (DIRECTOR OF STUDENT SERVICES): $191,994 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission of third street music school settlement is to provide access to music and dance education to new yorkers of all ages.
What it reported doing in 2024
Third street partners, school & community partnerships see schedule oestablished over 60 years ago, third street partners is a school and community partnership program that reaches thousands of students in pre-k through 12th grade across the five boroughs. In 2024-25, third street partners served 3,616 students in 30 public schools and hundreds more through programs in five community centers serving students in public housing. Through these partnerships, third street provides teaching artist residencies in nyc public schools and community centers to provide students with skill-based, sequential instruction that ranges from music and movement, to african percussion, to group violin, and rock band. Committed to serving under-resourced populations, about 75% of students engaged in third street partners are living at or below the poverty line. For many of these students, third street's programs are their first exposure to arts education.at third street, we believe that music and dance are essential core subjects to a child's education. We offer schools a customizable arts education program that is sustainable and tailored to each unique group of students served. By working closely with a school's administration, third street designs a program that fills a gap in the academic curriculum. All programs provide students with a foundational knowledge of musicianship, including instrumental skills, rhythm, pitch, music theory and vocabulary, and a basic set of repertoire. Programs are typically year-round for 28-32 weeks, beginning in september through june and culminating with performance opportunities. Further, students are invited to participate in the music & dance school's bridge-to-the-arts access program partners@3rd, which offers students the opportunity to participate in a year of free small group instruction in an instrument of their choice at third street's headquarters.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 87% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 79
- Transparency & Controls: 87
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 46
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 86.2%; rating input score 86
- Program expense ratio: 84.1%; rating input score 84
- Fundraising efficiency: $6.07 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 1.1%; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.13; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.16; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 10.6%; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 5.7% per year; rating input score 100; 47th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 4.1% per year; rating input score 100; 36th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 4.1% per year; rating input score 100; 29th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 86.2% of revenue deployed · 84.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 34 of 34 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $10M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $327K · 38 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 4 contractors listed · $557K reported
- Consistency: 37 of 37 current checks pass
- Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 7 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 25/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 38/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 18/100.