Society of St Vincent De Paul District Council of Mobile Alabama
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 822621024
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2019–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Mobile, AL, USA
- Phone
- 2514325173
- Rating
- 76
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Human Service Organizations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $720,895
- Expenses
- $682,175
- Assets
- $302,352
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
22 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MARY BERTHIAUME (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- CHARLES MOORE (SPIRITUAL AD)
- BEATTIE DOROTHY (DIRECTOR)
- LINDA HURM (2ND VP)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To engage in charitable, religious and educations activities in accordance with the tenants of st. Vincent de paul and the society of st. Vincent de paul. To unite the conferences located in the archdiocese of mobile by providing help, acting as a liason with regional and national councils, assisting with adherence and faithfulness to the rule, and ensuring that special works receive ongoing support.
What it reported doing in 2024
Eighteen parish conferences located in central and southern Alabama provided person-to-person assistance to impoverished members of the community. Conference members visited those in need, offering direct assistance in many forms, including food, utility payments, rent or mortgage assistance, prescriptions, or simply listening with compassion and offering prayers. 9,354 people were helped during 5,195 visits; in-kind services valued at 2,616 were rendered in 77 instances; and, goods valued at 87,722 were provided in 5,153 instances. Conference members and volunteers devoted 19,708 hours of service, logging 59,045 estimated miles.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 97% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 97% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. The filing does not identify recipients for some grant dollars and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 82
- Transparency & Controls: 67
- Accountability: 82
- Sustainability: 50
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 91.5%; rating input score 92
- Program expense ratio: 94.3%; rating input score 94
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 81.8%; rating input score 82; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 49.3%; rating input score 49; 28th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 4 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 57
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 5.4%; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.44; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 9.4% per year; rating input score 100; 61st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 8.7% per year; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -1.9% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 91.5% of revenue deployed · 94.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 18 of 18 board members independent · 4 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $643K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 22 people listed
- Consistency: 15 of 17 current checks pass · 2 findings to review
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes grants
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2019 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 49/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 6 not reported.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Foreign grants require schedule f did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 21/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 51/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.