Society of St Vincent De Paul Archdiocesan Council of Portland

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
930846858
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2020–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2008
Location
Springfield, OR, USA
Rating
83
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Public Foundations
Affiliation
Christianity

Reported finances

Revenue
$154,578
Expenses
$164,441
Assets
$73,039

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Sharon Hills (Archdiocesan Council President)
  • Chris Greiveldinger (Portland District Council President)
  • Shari Crawford (Mid-Willamette Valley President)
  • Ranae Thornton (OLV District Council President)
  • Martha Dacar (Lane County Council President)

People named in this filing

  • Sharon Hills (Archdiocesan Council President)
  • Rickie Schneider (Secretary & Treasurer)
  • Chris Greiveldinger (Portland District Council President)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Mission statement: A network of friends inspired by Gospel values growing in holiness and building a more just work through personal relationships with and service to our Neighbors in need. Provide grants and support to five St. Vincent de Paul district councils and approx 80 conferences throughout Oregon.

What it reported doing in 2024

Council member training for national and regional conferences. Helps members learn more about the SVdP organization and networking with other Vincentians across the country.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 75% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 63% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 75
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 27
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 77%; rating input score 77
  • Program expense ratio: 72.4%; rating input score 72

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -6.4%; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.44; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 8.8% per year; rating input score 100; 58th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 10% per year; rating input score 100; 67th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -7.4% per year; rating input score 0; 13th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 77% of revenue deployed · 72.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $119K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2020 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 20/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 35/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.