Society of Saint Vincent De Paul St Catherine of Alexandria Conference
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 273815568
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2012–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2018, Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2016
- Location
- Westford, MA, USA
- Phone
- 9786926353
- Rating
- 85
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Roman Catholic
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $141,254
- Expenses
- $79,392
- Assets
- $202,593
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- KEVIN REGAN (PRESIDENT)
- BERNARD PELOQUIN (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- KEVIN REGAN (PRESIDENT)
- BERNARD PELOQUIN (VICE PRESIDENT)
- DAN TOWERS (TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The society of st. Vincent de paul offers tangible assistance to those in need on a person-to-person basis. It is this personalized involvement that makes the work of the society unique. This aid may take the form of intervention, consultation, or often through direct dollar or in-kind service. An essential precept of the society's work is to provide help while conscientiously maintaining the confidentiality and dignity of those who are served. The society recognizes that it must assume, also, a role of advocacy for those who are defenseless or voiceless. Some 12 million persons are helped annually by vincentians in the united states.
What it reported doing in 2024
The society provides gas, electricity, home heatubg oil, and telephone bills assistance.(32 assisted)
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 71
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 84
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 56.3%; rating input score 56
- Program expense ratio: 97.3%; rating input score 97
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 43.8%; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.55; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 0.5% per year; rating input score 100; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 0.8% per year; rating input score 100; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 9.5% per year; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 56.3% of revenue deployed · 97.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 8 filed program accomplishments · $77K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Filing history: 8 filing years from 2012 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 56/100.