Society of Saint Vincent De Paul Council of Los Angeles
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 951644622
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Phone
- 3232246280
- Rating
- 82
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Human Service Organizations
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $17,150,462
- Expenses
- $19,605,114
- Assets
- $156,004,112
- Liabilities
- $2,252,776
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
24 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DAVID GARCIA (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
- SUSANA SANTANA (DEPUTY EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
- AIMEE BRAZEAU (DIRECTOR, 1st VICE PRESIDENT)
- PHYLLIS ANDERSON (Ventura District President)
- Lynn McCormick (San Pedro District President)
- PHILIP WIJMER (SVDPLA Council President)
Highest reported compensation
- DAVID GARCIA (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $183,094 total reported compensation
- RAYMOND LOPEZ (CAMP DIRECTOR): $154,046 total reported compensation
- JORGE MENJIVAR (DIRECTOR OF STORES): $149,373 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The society of st. Vincent de paul, council of los angeles is part of a worldwide organization of lay catholic men and women who are committed to live and grow in their christian faith through prayer and personal involvement in charitable works. The society's mission is accomplished through parish and community-based groups called conferences and programs called special works. The society's work includes any actions that promote the dignity of the person and alleviate suffering and distress, while correcting the conditions that cause them.
What it reported doing in 2024
Vincentian services/conference development - svdpla's vincentian services program provides immediate, vital help to those most vulnerable in our communities. Through 115 catholic parish-based volunteer groups called conferences of charity, the society provides direct, emergency assistance as well as ongoing connection with community resources to increase resourcefulness and sustainability of those the society serves. The program serves over 107,394 people in immediate need a year, providing food, clothing and rental and utility assistance, preventing families from becoming homeless, and maintaining heat, electricity and other services. The staff in our vincentian services program supports our 1,672 members with training, mentoring, and guidance in spiritual formation as well as providing referrals to other services in the community so our members can continue their work in their local area, preventing homelessness, giving our neighbors a hand up during their moment of extreme duress, and working to teach life skills to those most in need. As part of this program, the society launched a new initiatve providing direct financial assistance to individuals and families affected by disasters, including assistance with housing, utilities, and other essential living expenses. The society also provides in-kind assistance, including household goods through its "house in a box" initiative, clothing, food, hygiene supplies, and gift cards to help meet basic needs. Individuals and families are connected with partner agencies that provide a broad range of support services, including mental health services and other community-based resources. During the year, the society provided $751,151 in disaster relief for 373 individuals affected by the eaton and palisades wildfires. Form 990 part iii line 4d - other program services ================================================= circle v ranch camp - for more than 80 years, svdpla has operated a residential summer camp for underserved children ages 7-13. Located in the los padres national forest near lake cachuma, circle v ranch camp hosts an average of five one week resident camps (five nights and six days) that provide innovative and enriching outdoor experiences through a variety of programs. Circle v serves approximately 454 southern California youth each summer. About 95% of these children receive scholarship support to attend camp. Three nutritious meals are served daily. The camp aims to increase self-esteem, expand knowledge and learning, encourage respect for others and the earth, build morale and character, foster supportive relationships and fellowship and empower low-income youth. Due to the pandemic, circle v reduced the number of children attending each week to ensure covid safety protocols were met. In the off-season from september-june, circle v rents out the facility to other non-profit groups such as churches, youth groups, and high school retreats providing lodging, food service all in a natural outdoor environment.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 89% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 82
- Transparency & Controls: 75
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 47
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 89.7%; rating input score 90
- Program expense ratio: 83.8%; rating input score 84
- Fundraising efficiency: $9.26 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -14.3%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 7.96; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 3.8%; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 1.6% per year; rating input score 100; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 2.8% per year; rating input score 100; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 8.1% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 89.7% of revenue deployed · 83.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 19 of 19 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $16.4M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $183K · 24 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 4 contractors listed · $1.5M reported
- Consistency: 41 of 41 current checks pass
- Schedules: 10 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 8 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 36/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 7/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Form 990 shared with the board not reported.