Society of Explosives Engineers Education Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 341739106
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Lexington, KY, USA
- Phone
- 4403494400
- Rating
- 72
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Scholarships, Student Financial Aid Services, Awards
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $145,209
- Expenses
- $185,584
- Assets
- $3,894,570
- Liabilities
- $38,289
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
16 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- BRADEN T LUSK JR (PRESIDENT)
- ALASTAIR C TORRANCE (IMMEDIATE PAST PRESIDENT)
- JANEEN T SMITH (VICE PRESIDENT THRU NOV 2024)
- KRISTEN N KOLDEN (VICE PRESIDENT)
- TRAVIS A DAVIDSAVOR (VICE PRESIDENT)
- STEVEN B SHIVAK (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR THRU DEC 2024)
Highest reported compensation
- STEVEN B SHIVAK (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR THRU DEC 2024): $214,617 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The see education foundation was created in 1996 as a nonprofit organization to serve the long-term education interests of the industry through: - the inclusion of explosives instruction in engineering curricula - the collection of information - developing education and training materials - providing scholarships - promoting forums and media through which experience with the principles and techniques of explosives engineering can be taught, reported, discussed and published.
What it reported doing in 2024
Professional development and training: whether you're looking for retraining credit hours or to deepen your knowledge in new facets of the blasting world, the professional development and online training programs will put you on the path for career development and help you stay current with retraining and refresher hours. Our online training options will help start your professional development today.developed by industry professionals, the world of explosives is a website that tackles safety, the most frequently asked questions from homeowners, how vibrations affect structures and all the planning that goes into each blast. The world of explosives even has 30 minutes of videos covering blasting and vibration. It's the perfect resource for blasting professionals and homeowners.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Investment-supported. 74% of the money available for current operations came from recurring investment income.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 92% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and the filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 79
- Transparency & Controls: 60
- Accountability: 79
- Sustainability: 41
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 69.1%; rating input score 69
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: 0 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Claims monitoring procedures: Limited
- Requires narrative reports: Limited
- Conducts field audits: Limited
- May suspend future funding: Limited
- Requires financial reports: Limited
- Conducts site visits: Limited
- Requires grant agreements: Limited
- May require repayment: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 4 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -27.8%; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 20.99; rating input score 95; 95th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 12.3%; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 6.8% per year; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 1.6% per year; rating input score 100; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 7.6% per year; rating input score 100; 58th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 69.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 10 of 10 board members independent · 4 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $128K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $215K · 16 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 21 of 21 current checks pass
- Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 7 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 10/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 27/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 45/100.