Society of Corporate Compliance and Ethics & Health Care Compliance

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
900778759
IRS 990 coverage
2013–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025
Location
Eden Prairie, MN, USA
Phone
9529880141
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Chambers of Commerce & Business Leagues

Reported finances

Revenue
$22,635,828
Expenses
$22,971,317
Assets
$24,359,612
Liabilities
$5,727,713

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

29 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • GARTH JORDAN (CEO)
  • DAN ROACH (INTERIM CEO)
  • GERARD ZACK (FORMER CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • ADAM TURTELTAUB LEFT 102025 (ENGAGEMENT & STRATEGY OFFICER): $430,025 total reported compensation
  • APRIL KIEL (CHIEF OF STAFF): $321,397 total reported compensation
  • JOHN GILJE (CFO): $261,579 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To champion ethical practice and compliance standards; to provide the necessary resources for ethics and compliance professionals and others who share these principles; and to provide educational and networking opportunities to compliance and ethics professionals.

What it reported doing in 2025

See schedule o.publications, websites and social network site: the association offers two free monthly publications to its membership. There is a monthly magazine specifically for the health care compliance industry. A second monthly magazine is published for the compliance and ethics industry outside of health care. Our websites provide a wide range of information about the compliance and ethics profession and the association to people visiting the websites. The social network site provides important educational and networking opportunities for visitors to that site. These magazines, websites, and the association's social network site provide vital information on what is happening in the compliance and ethics profession. There are many articles informing and educating our membership about new rules, regulations, and legal requirements established by the state and federal governments. There are also articles about influential people within the compliance and ethics profession. It is critical that the resources to adequately prepare the people working in the profession are readily available and of the highest quality. The association will continue to strive to meet these specific needs of this growing profession. In addition, the association maintains and promotes two job boards containing listings of available paid and volunteer positions in the compliance sectors served by the association. These job boards are open to use by anyone within the sectors served by the association. They are focused exclusively on jobs related to compliance. The job boards are regularly promoted via email and the association's website with educational content to persons who have expressed interest in the association's educational publications, and to people who have taken advantage of the association's educational programs to improve their understanding of compliance's important role in society. The job board activity and revenue is not as significant as other activities and revenue of the association, but it is important to the accomplishment of the association's exempt purposes on many levels. First, it serves as a method of promoting and evaluating the role of compliance positions within the sectors served by the association. Second, it provides a method by which employers unfamiliar with compliance professional positions can become familiar with compliance professional positions and find a compliance professional or intern to support their work. Third, it promotes and improves the business environment of compliance professionals generally when compliance-related jobs are regularly and consistently promoted to those persons who have participated in and benefitted from an association educational program, including a conference, seminar or listserve.

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 94% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 64
  • Accountability: 70
  • Sustainability: 24
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 6 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Pass
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
    • Written employment contract: Pass
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Scored; rating input score 0
  • Grant itemization coverage: Scored; rating input score 0
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 55.6%; rating input score 56; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -1.5%; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.06; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.24; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 12.4%; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 1% per year; rating input score 100; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 1.6% per year; rating input score 100; 12th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: 10 of 18 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $430K · 29 people listed · 6 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $2.9M reported
  • Consistency: 13 of 13 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes foreign activity and executive pay
  • Filing history: 13 filing years from 2013 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 20 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight scored 0/100.
  • High — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 0/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 56/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 16/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 31/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 17/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 47/100.