Society of Anesthesia and Sleep Medicine

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
274613034
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2013–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2014, Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Lisle, IL, USA
Phone
4143898608
Rating
59
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Adult, Continuing Education

Reported finances

Revenue
$41,625
Expenses
$119,381
Assets
$221,981
Liabilities
$10,315

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • BHARGAVI GALI (PRESIDENT)
  • MANDEEP SINGH (PRESIDENT ELECT)
  • JOANNE BUCKLEY (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

People named in this filing

  • BHARGAVI GALI (PRESIDENT)
  • MANDEEP SINGH (PRESIDENT ELECT)
  • OLUBUKOLA NAFIU (TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The mission of the society of anesthesia and sleep medicine is to advance standards of care for clinical problems shared by anesthesiology and sleep medicine, including peri-operative management of sleep disordered breathing, and to promote interdisciplinary communication, education, and research in matters common to anesthesia and sleep.

What it reported doing in 2024

Providing an environment, meetings, and forums for the introduction and sharing of ideas and information for improving health in connection with sleep related medicine and the medical discipline of anesthesia.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 72% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of total spending goes to programs and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 47
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 30
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 61.6%; rating input score 62
  • Program expense ratio: 21.5%; rating input score 21

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -186.8%; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.86; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.05; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -17.7% per year; rating input score 0; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -16.2% per year; rating input score 0; 17th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 2.6% per year; rating input score 100; 49th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 61.6% of revenue deployed · 21.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $26K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 11 filing years from 2013 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 21/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 5/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 22/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.