Society for the Protection of New Hampshire Forests

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
020222237
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024, Form 990-N 2014
Location
Concord, NH, USA
Phone
6032249945
Rating
73
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Forest Conservation

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$13,274,033
Expenses
$6,335,886
Assets
$115,413,032
Liabilities
$2,246,374

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

20 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JACK SAVAGE (PRESIDENT)
  • ANNE TRUSLOW (VICE PRESIDENT FOR DEVELOPMENT)
  • TONY CHEEK (VICE PRESIDENT FOR FINANCE)

Highest reported compensation

  • JACK SAVAGE (PRESIDENT): $189,025 total reported compensation
  • ANNE TRUSLOW (VICE PRESIDENT FOR DEVELOPMENT): $126,758 total reported compensation
  • TONY CHEEK (VICE PRESIDENT FOR FINANCE): $125,021 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The society for the protection of New Hampshire forests was founded in 1901 to protect the state's most important landscapes and promote the wise use of its natural resources. In 2019, the national land trust accreditation commission renewed the forest society's status as an accredited land trust. Accreditation includes the forest society in a network of more than 400 accredited land trusts across the nation, and demonstrates its commitment to professional excellence and to maintaining the public's trust in its conservation work.

What it reported doing in 2024

Education and outreach: selected outreach education, communications, recreation stewardship eventsfy'25 outreach education highlights and events listmay 4 nh farm and forest expo at deerfield fair grounds 100+ visitorsmay 15th - creek farm poetry reading with benjamin doyle -20 participantsmay 18th creek farm: woods, whales & water festival at creek farm with blue ocean society. 30 participants june 7 rocks adult field camp birding / birdhouses - 9 participantsjune 8th birding with jack swatt at ashuelot river headwaters -7 participantsjune 8th- celebration and hike with landowner, ken stern at the deepwood forest conservation easement in canterbury -24 participantsportsmouth forest society at piscataqua riverfest in portsmouth - tabletop display, tent, statewide mapjuly 19 creek farm walking tour on little harbor trail with matt scaccia -12 participantsjuly 21 tom rush forest event with namesake, tom rush present for stories and more- 44 participantsat the rocks, the nh fish and game nh summer teacher institute: the watershed education institute july 25 15 teachers attending outdoor and indoor programs and field work in local rivers or wetlands. Forest society staff nigel and dave guided a hike to measure timber volume of some large trees along the historic mile path at the rocks.our 5th annual do-it-yourself hikes program offered in september and october the theme of the 2024 5 hikes challenge was inclusion and diversity in the outdoors. "we all belong outdoors" +/-150 participants total (august 31 to october 31)september 12 mt major trail ribbon-cutting and hike event -20 at event; 9 on hikeseptember 12 the fells "wind water fire and ice" dave -15 attendedseptember 21 - forest society annual meeting in peterborough +/- 85 participantsseptember 27 snhu botany lab professor katherine york -12 studentsseptember 29 lost river hike event w/ lgbtq affinity group lez hang -15 participantscreek farm programs for durham unh active retirement association- september 25 - the history of creek farm -15 participants- october 2 fall foliage: why leaves change color -12 participants- october 9 fall fungi id and foray at creek farm -12 participants- october 16- a century of land conservation at the forest society -10 participants concord schools district project see students field trips to the floodplain where project see staff hosted several school visits for 2nd grade students across the district to learn about wildlife habitats and soils of forest, wetland and fields on the merrimack river floodplain-200 students, parent chaperones and teachersoctober 10 monson russ dickerman remembrance event and tours. -60 attendedoctober 18th fall foliage on the floodplain tour for concord olli -17 attendedoctober 26: gear swap and foliage pop-up hike for 5 hikes challenge -18 attended5 hikes challenge special guided hike events: saturday, september 14 at 10 am: join forest society staff nigel manley for a hike along the trails at forest society north at the rocks in bethlehem. -15 participantssunday, september 29 at 10 am: join the nh chapter of lgbtq outdoors and lezhang seacoast for a family-friendly visit to lost river gorge & boulder caves in north woodstock -15 participantsfriday, october 11 at 10 am: join forest society to celebrate peak autumn foliage at morse preserve in alton, one of the 5 hikes challenge destinations -9 participantssaturday, october 26 at 11 am: join forest society for easy walk on the floodplain at merrimack river outdoor education & conservation area -20 participantssaturday, october 26 at 10 am: a community gear swap from 10 am to 2 pm at the conservation center in concord-20 participantsnovember 2 nh association of conservation commissions annual meeting something wild hosts keynote program -85 attendeesnovember 9 mt major guided hike for bipoc affinity group with mardi fuller -5 attendeesdecember 3: nhti theater concord- olli screening and discussion of "monadnock the mountain that stands alone." -35 attendedjanuary 16

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 66% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 98% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 55
  • Transparency & Controls: 76
  • Accountability: 96
  • Sustainability: 87
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 42%; rating input score 42
  • Program expense ratio: 76.9%; rating input score 77
  • Fundraising efficiency: $19.46 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 93.8%; rating input score 94; 17th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 73.7%; rating input score 74; 15th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 94.4%; rating input score 94; 28th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 52.3%; rating input score 94; 94th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 18.22; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 7%; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 1.3% per year; rating input score 100; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 2.3% per year; rating input score 100; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 2.9% per year; rating input score 100; 22nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 42% of revenue deployed · 76.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 17 of 18 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $4.9M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $189K · 20 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 2 contractors listed · $483K reported
  • Consistency: 33 of 34 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2009 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 8 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 5 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 42/100.
  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 56/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 36/100.