Society for Science & the Public
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 530196483
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
- Location
- Washington, DC, USA
- Phone
- 2027852255
- Rating
- 74
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Professional Societies, Associations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $91,128,420
- Expenses
- $40,882,106
- Assets
- $165,328,887
- Liabilities
- $13,293,771
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
34 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MAYA AJMERA (PRESIDENT & CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- MAYA AJMERA (PRESIDENT & CEO): $787,213 total reported compensation
- RACHEL ALPER (CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER): $327,584 total reported compensation
- MICHAEL VOSS (PUBLISHER): $313,121 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Society for science is a champion for science, dedicated to expanding scientific literacy, effective stem education and scientific research.
What it reported doing in 2024
Science education programs - for decades, society for science has offered world-class science and engineering research competitions for young people. The regeneron science talent search (regeneron sts) is the nation's oldest and most prestigious science and math competition for high school seniors. The regeneron international science and engineering fair (regeneron isef) is the world's largest global science competition for high schoolers. The thermo fisher scientific junior innovators challenge (thermo fisher jic) is the society's premier middle school stem competition for u.s. Students in grades six through eight. Through these competitions, the society encourages and rewards independent scientific research and project-based learning while growing the pipeline of future stem professionals in 2015, the society expanded its programming to include outreach and equity work, to ensure that every young person in the united states with an interest in stem, has the opportunity to become a scientist or engineer. The advocate program supports educators mentoring underrepresented students in stem fields and helping students find and compete in science research competitions. Two annual research teachers conferences, one for middle school teachers and one for high school teachers, bring together science research teachers to share best practices, troubleshoot challenges and develop a support network for teachers who lead students in scientific research. The society's stem research grants help teachers expand and enhance independent research programs for students, and our stem action grants provide catalytic funds for innovative community-based stem organizations. These programs reach millions of students, educators and community members across the united states, the district of columbia and u.s. Territories.for decades, the society for science has offered many of the most revered k-12 science competitions in the world: the regeneron science talent search, the regeneron international science and engineering fair, and for middle school students, broadcom masters (math, applied science, technology and engineering for rising stars) . Through these programs, which encourage and reward independent scientific research and project-based learning, the society is growing the pipeline of stem professionals by empowering our future generation of talent to become scientists, engineers and inventors.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 90% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 85% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 57
- Transparency & Controls: 75
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 80
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 38.6%; rating input score 39
- Program expense ratio: 83.8%; rating input score 84
- Fundraising efficiency: $25.88 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 93.8%; rating input score 94; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Pass
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: 2 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 25
- Claims monitoring procedures: Pass
- Requires narrative reports: Fail
- Conducts field audits: Fail
- May suspend future funding: Fail
- Requires financial reports: Pass
- Conducts site visits: Fail
- Requires grant agreements: Fail
- May require repayment: Fail
- Grant itemization coverage: 98.6%; rating input score 99; 36th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 55.1%; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.04; rating input score 82; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.08; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 10.5%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 5.5% per year; rating input score 100; 45th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 12.6% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 2.5% per year; rating input score 100; 17th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 38.6% of revenue deployed · 83.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 17 of 17 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $34.3M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $787K · 34 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $5.3M reported
- Consistency: 40 of 42 current checks pass · 2 findings to review
- Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 37 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 22 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 39/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight: 6 of 8 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 3/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Foreign grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.