Society for Rehabilitation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
340901410
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2021–2021
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2021
Location
Concord, OH, USA
Phone
4403762588
Rating
40
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$80
Expenses
$6,853
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Richard J Kessler (President)
  • Cynthia Viomar (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Mike Warren (Chairman)
  • Richard J Kessler (President)
  • Cynthia Viomar (Vice President)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The Society for Rehabilitation assists physically and communicatively disabled adults to achieve their highest level of physical, social, and emotional independence. The Society, through its Day Habilitation Program helps such persons to function within the community through the provision of outpatient rehabilitation services including, but not limited to, social services education, recreation, and family development. The Society treats cognitive adults with developmental disabilities, traumatic brain injuries, and stroke victims. The Society is licensed by the State of Ohio and funded through Medicaid, Ohio Health Home Care Services, donations from the public, and patient self pay. The Society provides services for adults that do not have the ability to pay. No one is turned away due to financial conditions. The Society's programs include educational, restorative, social/recreational, and personal enrichment to help clients have more independence and fulfillment in their lives.

What it reported doing in 2021

The Society for Rehabilitation did not have operations during this time period due to the COVID-19 pandemic and then made the decision to terminate its operations permanently.

Operating model

Revenue model
Investment-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from recurring investment income.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 8
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -8,466.2%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 1/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.