Society for Pentecostal Studies

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
237251271
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2024–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Tulsa, OK, USA
Phone
4058562025
Rating
66
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Buddhism
Affiliation
Christianity

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$135,919
Expenses
$154,327
Assets
$90,337

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MARCIA CLARKE (Vice President)
  • ROBBY WADDELL (Vice President)
  • WOLFGANG VONDEY (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • ADRIAN HINKLE (Executive Dir.)
  • MARCIA CLARKE (Vice President)
  • ROBBY WADDELL (Vice President)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The Society provides a forum for academic research, providing an annual meeting in which papers on current research are presented and critiqued, engaging professors, students, and researchers globally.

What it reported doing in 2025

We finished the year with over 350 participants at our annual meeting which is an all-time high for our organization.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. A relatively small share of total spending goes to programs and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 62
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 25
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 65.1%; rating input score 65
  • Program expense ratio: 57.4%; rating input score 57

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -13.5%; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.59; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -31.2% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 152.1% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 65.1% of revenue deployed · 57.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $89K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2024 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 57/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 11/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 42/100.