Society for Pediatric Radiology
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 042627742
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Lansing, MI, USA
- Phone
- 5173592188
- Rating
- 62
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Mental Health, Crisis Intervention N.E.C.
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $2,232,236
- Expenses
- $1,657,627
- Assets
- $4,638,283
- Liabilities
- $702,240
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
19 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MICHAEL CALLAHAN (PRESIDENT)
- JANET REID (PRESIDENT-ELECT)
- LANE DONNELLY (FIRST VICE-PRESIDENT)
- ANDREA DORIA (SECOND VICE-PRESIDENT)
- ANGELA DAVIS (CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- ANGELA DAVIS (CEO): $20,445 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The society is committed to improving health care of the pediatric patient through imaging, education, and dissemination of information to all pediatric healthcare providers who utilize radiological imaging techniques.
What it reported doing in 2025
Society of chiefs of radiology at children's hospitals (scorch) - established to provide a forum for the chiefs (chairs, acting chairs) of radiology at children's hospitals to learn, discuss, and address concerns specifically related to management issues associated with radiology in children's hospitals.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 79% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 99% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 44
- Transparency & Controls: 74
- Accountability: 79
- Sustainability: 71
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 44.2%; rating input score 44
- Program expense ratio: 58.6%; rating input score 59
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: 2 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 25
- Claims monitoring procedures: Pass
- Requires narrative reports: Fail
- Conducts field audits: Fail
- May suspend future funding: Fail
- Requires financial reports: Pass
- Conducts site visits: Fail
- Requires grant agreements: Fail
- May require repayment: Fail
- Grant itemization coverage: 42.9%; rating input score 43; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 4 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 25.7%; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.8; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.15; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 1.2%; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -3.3% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 2.4% per year; rating input score 100; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 5.2% per year; rating input score 100; 34th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 44.2% of revenue deployed · 58.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 14 of 14 board members independent · 4 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $972K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $20K · 19 people listed
- Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $167K reported
- Consistency: 33 of 33 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, and related organizations
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2010 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 44/100.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 59/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight: 6 of 8 not reported.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 7 not reported.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 43/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 41/100.