Society for Pediatric Anesthesia
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 363532637
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Richmond, VA, USA
- Phone
- 8042829780
- Rating
- 72
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $3,395,945
- Expenses
- $3,178,762
- Assets
- $12,235,135
- Liabilities
- $689,817
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
19 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- PEGGY P MCNAULL MD (PRESIDENT)
- JOHN FIADJOE MD (PRESIDENT-ELECT)
- JAMES J FEHR MD (IMMEDIATE PAST PRESIDENT)
- STEWART HINCKLEY (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
People named in this filing
- PEGGY P MCNAULL MD (PRESIDENT)
- JOHN FIADJOE MD (PRESIDENT-ELECT)
- OLUTOYIN OLUTOYE MD MSC FAAP (SECRETARY/TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The purpose of the society for pediatric anesthesia is to continually advance the safety and quality of anesthetic care, perioperative management, and alleviation of pain in children.
What it reported doing in 2025
Accreditation expenses are incurred in connection with the administration of an accreditation exam for healthcare providers in the field of pediatric anesthesia
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 83% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 90% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. The filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 64
- Transparency & Controls: 72
- Accountability: 82
- Sustainability: 62
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 72.7%; rating input score 73
- Program expense ratio: 71.4%; rating input score 71
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 85.7%; rating input score 86; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: 2 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 25
- Claims monitoring procedures: Pass
- Requires narrative reports: Pass
- Conducts field audits: Fail
- May suspend future funding: Fail
- Requires financial reports: Fail
- Conducts site visits: Fail
- Requires grant agreements: Fail
- May require repayment: Fail
- Grant itemization coverage: 90.8%; rating input score 91; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 4 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 57
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 6.4%; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.85; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.06; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 4.6% per year; rating input score 100; 34th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 4.9% per year; rating input score 100; 37th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 8.4% per year; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 72.7% of revenue deployed · 71.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 16 of 16 board members independent · 4 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 6 filed program accomplishments · $2.3M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 19 people listed
- Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $791K reported
- Consistency: 26 of 29 current checks pass · 3 findings to review
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, and grants
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2010 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 3 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight: 6 of 8 not reported.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 7 not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 47/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Foreign grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 58/100.