Society for Martial Arts Instruction Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 200392897
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2014–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- New York, NY, USA
- Phone
- 2126777228
- Rating
- 36
- Verdict
- REVIEW
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Amateur Sports
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $34,570
- Expenses
- $28,026
- Assets
- $38,826
- Liabilities
- $62,925
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MICHELLE GAY (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- MICHELLE GAY (PRESIDENT)
- ZELDA GAY (CHAIRMAN)
- DIANE BANK (SECTY/DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Offer full and partial scholarships to people attending karate classes, self offense (preventative personal protection training) and kids on the offense (anti-bullying), de-escalation and listening, and teacher trainings and committed to empowering people of all ages through theknowledge and practice of martial arts and somatic based movement practices.
What it reported doing in 2024
Self offense workshops at gene dunn's shotokan dojo self offense/kids on the offense workshops hosted at society for martial arts instruction dojo
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.
The verdict
REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 0
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 57
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
- Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 18.9%; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.39; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.62; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -45.5% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -12.6% per year; rating input score 0; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -1.1% per year; rating input score 0; 34th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 4 filed program accomplishments
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 10 filing years from 2014 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 55/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 3/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.