Society for Cardiovascular Pathology Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
222816999
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2021–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Birmingham, AL, USA
Phone
2059756964
Rating
47
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$65,199
Expenses
$31,242
Assets
$252,831
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Joseph Maleszewski MD PhD (President)
  • Giulia D'Amati MD (Vice-President)

People named in this filing

  • Joseph Maleszewski MD PhD (President)
  • Giulia D'Amati MD (Vice-President)
  • Silvio Litovsky MD (Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The Society for Cardiovascular Pathology is devoted to the advancement of the study of cardiovascular disorders. Our members include pathologists, cardiologists, surgeons, MDs, PhDs, and DVMs, educators, and investigators, united by our common interest. Information regarding the Society, meeting announcements, and other information of interest in the study of cardiovascular disorders will be posted as they become available. We welcome you to become a member of our organization and join a dedicated group of professionals in the advancement of the study of cardiovascular disease and research.

What it reported doing in 2024

Cardiovascular Pathology Journal. Official Journal of the Society. Scientific Journal dissemination.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 84
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 52.1%; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 8.09; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -78.6% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 5.6% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 10.1% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2021 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.