Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions
Legal name: Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 450699908
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2017–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-N 2011
- Location
- Washington, DC, USA
- Phone
- 800-992-7224
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Chambers of Commerce & Business Leagues
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $85,446
- Expenses
- $799,246
- Assets
- $1,048,704
- Liabilities
- $8,694
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
26 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- GEORGE DANGAS MD MSCAI (PRESIDENT, THEN PAST PRES.)
- JAMES HERMILLER MD MSCAI (PRESIDENT ELECT, THEN PRESIDENT)
- SUNIL V RAO MD FSCAI (PAST PRESIDENT - UNTIL 05/24)
- TIMOTHY D HENRY (PAST PRESIDENT - UNTIL 05/24)
- SRIHARI S NAIDU MD FSCAI (VICE PRESIDENT, PRES. ELECT)
- FRANCESCA DEA (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER)
Highest reported compensation
- FRANCESCA DEA (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER): $437,368 total reported compensation
- KATHIE H CLEARY (VP OF FINANCE AND ADMIN): $271,909 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To lead the global interventional cardiovascular community through education, advocacy, research, and quality patient care.
What it reported doing in 2024
Scai actively represents its members at the state and federal levels, maintaining regular contactw ith congressional leaders and key administration officials, tracking critical legislative matters as well as public and private payer issues concerning coverage, coding and reimbursement. We build coalitions while coordinating action on behalf of our members and their patients.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 55
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 16
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 85.7%; rating input score 86; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -835.4%; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.31; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 16%; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: -33.4% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -16.3% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 11 programs and campaigns described on the official site
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: 21 of 21 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments
- Leadership: top reported pay $437K · 26 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $170K reported
- Consistency: 9 of 10 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes executive pay
- Filing history: 7 filing years from 2017 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 6/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Schedule R controlled transactions itemized did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 28/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Form 990 shared with the board not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 14/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 29/100.