Soccer Centerville Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
311412968
IRS 990 coverage
2012–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Centerville, OH, USA
Phone
9376098246
Rating
81
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Human Services

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,017,911
Expenses
$1,088,733
Assets
$587,951
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DEAN BURGESS (PRESIDENT)
  • JEFF MONBECK (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • JEFF MONBECK (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $76,100 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

At fc dayton, our mission is to provide a community-based soccer club that offers inclusive and accessible opportunities for individuals of all ages and skill levels in centerville, Ohio. We are dedicated to fostering a love for the beautiful game, promoting physical fitness, and developing character through the sport of soccer. We strive to create a supportive and nurturing environment where players can grow, learn, and excel both on and off the field. Our programs, including rec soccer, academy, youth competitive, high school, futsal, and wpsl, cater to the diverse needs and aspirations of our members. By emphasizing teamwork, sportsmanship, and personal growth, we aim to instill lifelong values in our players. We believe that soccer is a powerful tool for building strong communities, fostering friendships, and promoting a healthy lifestyle. At fc dayton, we are committed to providing exceptional coaching, state-of-the-art facilities, and a positive learning environment.

What it reported doing in 2024

Fc dayton youth competitive program provides soccer opportunities for players that want to play at a more competitive level, and provides them training opportunities to be able to transition to high school soccer. The club provides training opportunities throughout the fall, winter and spring seasons, league play throughout the midwest, and local soccer tournament participation for younger teams and travel opportunities for older teams. The program serves the u3 and u19 age groups. The club runs summer and vacation camp programs to begin the training process for the upcoming season as well as to provide opportunities for players to continue working on their soccer skills while on vacation breaks. The programs are run by the fc dayton staff with the assistance of high school age and older players who may have a desire to promote their skills at the next level, and to give them an experience training youth soccer players. The club also provides winter training opportunities. The club provides mentoring opportunities between the older and younger teams, and participates in top soccer as well. Fc dayton runs different team building programs at no additonal cost for players to participate in with other players and families, such as soccer olympics and an annual awards event.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 96% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 99% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 80
  • Transparency & Controls: 93
  • Accountability: 84
  • Sustainability: 33
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 91.5%; rating input score 92
  • Program expense ratio: 87.7%; rating input score 88
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 5 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 62
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -7%; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.54; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 7%; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -0.5% per year; rating input score 0; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 1.4% per year; rating input score 100; 21st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 0.5% per year; rating input score 100; 19th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 91.5% of revenue deployed · 87.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 4 of 4 board members independent · 5 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $954K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $76K · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 22 of 22 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules · includes grants
  • Filing history: 13 filing years from 2012 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 7 not reported.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 21/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 25/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 47/100.